Access to justice is the paramount goal of the judiciary by imparting the solace to the litigant

Access to justice is the paramount goal of the judiciary by imparting the solace to the litigant treating the Advocate representing the cause of the litigant as an officer of the court, if the cause of imparting justice is required by the Hon'ble Judges of High Courts to be served and when in doubt or conflict this goal has priority over possible harm from unskilled Judge having egoistic trend towards his duties or unethical providers (keep in mind how unethical and unskilled most of the Judges are as they are resuming their offices at any time and started dismissing the case , the moment the lawyer is involved in respect of his responsibility in some other court in the campus of more than one hundred squire meter of area having 59 courts function at a time and making it only ONE COURT CALLED AS HIGH COURT). Lawyers use regulation of profession ethics in representing the Hon'ble Judges as my lord , despite the facts that most of the Judge are suffering from their carnal desire to promote their sons and daughter by assigning them as Counsel of different INSTRUMENTALITY of STATE by providing the patronage from the other respective Judges and vice verse as a cartel mechanism to restrict trade in legal profession.  Straight forwards Lawyers are not affordable to their dictate but they simply address these judges as MY LORD just to preserve the Judicial Institution and may not be available to behave like a Slave under ANGLO SAXON JURISPRUDENCE, which has been inflicted upon our judicial system by the so called selfish political power now represented as some time at par with the identity of our great nation. From 1999 onwards, I became the representative of Allahabad Chapter of the organizer for the LAWYERS of ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT in the CHIEF JUSTICES CONFERENCE OF THE WORLD at CMS. I was Appointed AMICUS CURIE since 1986 onwards  in different JAIL APPEALS and in most of them were decided with the applause of the Hon'ble Judges, I offered my services voluntarily to represent the down trodden class of citizen at  the best of my performance. It was in the year of 2008 the Consortium under the benevolent leader sri RASMUS TENBERGAN appearing as Chair person to unite the citizens of  different nation eager to make every citizen as world citizen organized WORLD PARLIAMENTARY EXPERIMENT AT BONN , GERMANY In which i participated as the representative of MIDDLE EAST ASIA I remain Editor of ALLAHABAD SELECTED CASES, a journal published by MANAV LAW HOUSE and started the   Law School at my residence to educate young lawyers. sponsored the Conference on Access to Justice  in the 2009's at Singapore of INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF JURISTS  attended by Hon'ble Justices Sri  P. Shitha Shivam and Hon'ble Justice Sri Cyric Joshef , both judges of Supreme Court and i tried to convince them issuing its report which is access-able in the GOOGLE in the name of YOGESH SAXENA .I was requested to participate in Public Interest Litigation of Ganga Pollution Mater since 2006-2009, till I Become Member of Bar of the Supreme Court in Sept. 2009 . I was inducted as Mediator amongst by the Hon’ble Justices and approved by Hon’ble  Justice Markandey Katzu due to my ability to participates in  Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. A lawyer should avoid even the appearance of professional impropriety. The Conference found that access to legal services by low- and moderate-income persons had not been significantly enhanced in India and the people has the greed for money and the Judges are not aloof from its lust as seen in the case of Provident  Fund SCAM, Justice Dinakaran matter and in Justice Nirmala Yadav Case,  despite recent technological advances and the previous decade's experimentation with legal advertising, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, national and local legal clinics, lawyer referral and information services, and a variety of prepaid legal plans. The Conference "strongly supported the relaxation of current barriers to the involvement of non-attorneys in the provision of legal assistance and called for careful experimentation with lay advocacy programs to determine whether and how much such representation will increase access to the legal system."