HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI SUDHIR AGRAWAL
YOU HAVE MADE THE ENCROACHMENT UPON YOUR POWER ASSIGNED UPON YOU AS THE JUDGE OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT. IF YOU CAN SWEAR IN THE NAME OF GOD THAT THE JUDGEMENT , WHICH YOU HAVE DELIVERED CLANDESTINELY IN YOUR CHAMBER. AFTER MY ARGUMENTS ADVANCED AS STATED ABOVE I POSE A QUESTION TO YOUR LORDSHIP THAT WHETHER YOU ARE FAIR IN YOUR CONSCIENCE IN WRITING THE AFORESAID PASSAGE.
SRI Y.K.SAXENA STATED THAT IN VIEW OF THE STAND TAKEN BY MY CLIENT IN WHOSE FAVOUR THE EX PARTE DECREE HAS BEEN PASSED , THE COURT MAY NOT BE REQUIRED TO HELD UPTHE PROCEEDINGS FOR LONG AND THE MATTER MAY BE DISPOSED OF / DECIDED AFTER CONSIDERING HS STAND. SRI SAXENA FURTHER STATED THAT THE EX -PARTE DECREE DATED 31.3.1989 SHOULD BE TREATED AND CONFINED ONLY TO THE DEFENDANT NO. 1 IN THE SUIT AND IF THAT DECREE , IN ANY MANNER AFFECTS DEFENDANT NO. 2 ( DECREE WAS AGAINST THE TENANT IN CHIEF WHO HAD NOT APPEARED TO CONTEST THE MATTER AND SDESPTE THE FACT THAT DECREE PASSED AGAINST MAHENDRA DUTT FOR AREARS OF RENT RS. 2340/ - and SMT RAMA DUBEY ACCEPTED THAT SHE REMAIN THE SUB TANANT OF MAHENDRA DUTTA PATAK AND WAS PAYING RENT OF Rs. 100/- to MAHESH DATTA PATHAK AS AN ADMITTED FACT, THAN HOW SHE CAN DEPOSITE THE SECURITY OF DECREETAL AMOUNT AND FILE WIT PETITION BY FILING FORGED , FABRICATED and MANUFACTURE DOCUMENT AND STILL CONTINUED TO GET PROTECTION AGAINST HER EVICTION), THE SAMEBE DEEMED NULL AND VOID.
JUSTICE SUDHIR AGRAWAL , IF YOU CAN SWEAR IN THE NAME OF ALMIGHTY POWER TO WHOM YOU BELIEVE TO BE THE GOD AS DESPITE BEING BORN IN HINDU FAMILY, YOU STILL NOT WORSHIP THE TEMPLE OF LORD RAMA , THE EVIDENCE WAS CONCLUSIVE THAT THE PILLARS OF THE TEMPLE OF LORD RAMA WERE FOUND ON WHICH THE SUPER STRUCTURE BY THE AGGRESSORS AND INVADERS HAVING COMMITTED THE DEVASTATION OF THE ENTIRE WORLD, FOR WHICH JUSTICE SUDHIR NARAIN AGRAWAL RETIRED HAD EXPRESSED HIS LORDSHIP ANNOYANCE AND AS SUCH I HAVE EXPRESSED MY RESENTMENT ALSO , WHETHER THAT HAS NOT BECOME THE REASON OF WRITING FALSEHOOD. IN THE SPECIAL APPEAL FILED AGAINST YOU JUDGEMENT WHEREIN THE ENCROACHMENT ON THE PASSAGE TO VIJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL AND 5 OTHERS WERE DONE AND COMMISSIONER GDA GOT SUCH ENCROACHMENT COMIITTED BY THE MAN OF VIRENDRA SHAHI , AND YOU DISMISSED THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND THAT DESPITE THE FORGERY IN SANCTION OF THE MAP WAS RECORDED BY THE VICE CHAIRMAN OF DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WAS FINDING CONCURRENT ON RECORD , YOU GOT THE WRIT PETITION DISMISSED. THE DIVISION BENCH PRESIDED BY JUSTICE SAYYAD RAFAT ALAM, AFTERTHEDELAY OF ABOUT * MONTHS WITHOUT EVEN PASSING ANY ORDER FOR ISSUANCE TO THE NOTICES, WAS SURPRISED ND GOT THE SPECIAL APPEAL ALLOWED BY OBSERVING THAT THE JUDGEMENT OF JUSTICE SUDHIR AGRAWAL BE IGNORED AS NULL AND VOID.
HAVE YOU WRITTEN THESE WORDS TO TAKE THE REVENGE.
WHO WAS I AS THE LAWYER TO SAY THAT MY CLIENT IS NOT PRESSING THE CASE AGAINST LAND GRABBER, A MAFIA, A RANK TRESPASSER , WHO ADMITTEDLY WAS THE TRESPASSERS HAVING THE SUPPORT OF HER HETCH MAN TO KILL MY CLIENT ALL THE TIME.
JUSTICE
YOU HAVE MADE THE ENCROACHMENT UPON YOUR POWER ASSIGNED UPON YOU AS THE JUDGE OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT. IF YOU CAN SWEAR IN THE NAME OF GOD THAT THE JUDGEMENT , WHICH YOU HAVE DELIVERED CLANDESTINELY IN YOUR CHAMBER. AFTER MY ARGUMENTS ADVANCED AS STATED ABOVE I POSE A QUESTION TO YOUR LORDSHIP THAT WHETHER YOU ARE FAIR IN YOUR CONSCIENCE IN WRITING THE AFORESAID PASSAGE.
SRI Y.K.SAXENA STATED THAT IN VIEW OF THE STAND TAKEN BY MY CLIENT IN WHOSE FAVOUR THE EX PARTE DECREE HAS BEEN PASSED , THE COURT MAY NOT BE REQUIRED TO HELD UPTHE PROCEEDINGS FOR LONG AND THE MATTER MAY BE DISPOSED OF / DECIDED AFTER CONSIDERING HS STAND. SRI SAXENA FURTHER STATED THAT THE EX -PARTE DECREE DATED 31.3.1989 SHOULD BE TREATED AND CONFINED ONLY TO THE DEFENDANT NO. 1 IN THE SUIT AND IF THAT DECREE , IN ANY MANNER AFFECTS DEFENDANT NO. 2 ( DECREE WAS AGAINST THE TENANT IN CHIEF WHO HAD NOT APPEARED TO CONTEST THE MATTER AND SDESPTE THE FACT THAT DECREE PASSED AGAINST MAHENDRA DUTT FOR AREARS OF RENT RS. 2340/ - and SMT RAMA DUBEY ACCEPTED THAT SHE REMAIN THE SUB TANANT OF MAHENDRA DUTTA PATAK AND WAS PAYING RENT OF Rs. 100/- to MAHESH DATTA PATHAK AS AN ADMITTED FACT, THAN HOW SHE CAN DEPOSITE THE SECURITY OF DECREETAL AMOUNT AND FILE WIT PETITION BY FILING FORGED , FABRICATED and MANUFACTURE DOCUMENT AND STILL CONTINUED TO GET PROTECTION AGAINST HER EVICTION), THE SAMEBE DEEMED NULL AND VOID.
JUSTICE SUDHIR AGRAWAL , IF YOU CAN SWEAR IN THE NAME OF ALMIGHTY POWER TO WHOM YOU BELIEVE TO BE THE GOD AS DESPITE BEING BORN IN HINDU FAMILY, YOU STILL NOT WORSHIP THE TEMPLE OF LORD RAMA , THE EVIDENCE WAS CONCLUSIVE THAT THE PILLARS OF THE TEMPLE OF LORD RAMA WERE FOUND ON WHICH THE SUPER STRUCTURE BY THE AGGRESSORS AND INVADERS HAVING COMMITTED THE DEVASTATION OF THE ENTIRE WORLD, FOR WHICH JUSTICE SUDHIR NARAIN AGRAWAL RETIRED HAD EXPRESSED HIS LORDSHIP ANNOYANCE AND AS SUCH I HAVE EXPRESSED MY RESENTMENT ALSO , WHETHER THAT HAS NOT BECOME THE REASON OF WRITING FALSEHOOD. IN THE SPECIAL APPEAL FILED AGAINST YOU JUDGEMENT WHEREIN THE ENCROACHMENT ON THE PASSAGE TO VIJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL AND 5 OTHERS WERE DONE AND COMMISSIONER GDA GOT SUCH ENCROACHMENT COMIITTED BY THE MAN OF VIRENDRA SHAHI , AND YOU DISMISSED THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND THAT DESPITE THE FORGERY IN SANCTION OF THE MAP WAS RECORDED BY THE VICE CHAIRMAN OF DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WAS FINDING CONCURRENT ON RECORD , YOU GOT THE WRIT PETITION DISMISSED. THE DIVISION BENCH PRESIDED BY JUSTICE SAYYAD RAFAT ALAM, AFTERTHEDELAY OF ABOUT * MONTHS WITHOUT EVEN PASSING ANY ORDER FOR ISSUANCE TO THE NOTICES, WAS SURPRISED ND GOT THE SPECIAL APPEAL ALLOWED BY OBSERVING THAT THE JUDGEMENT OF JUSTICE SUDHIR AGRAWAL BE IGNORED AS NULL AND VOID.
HAVE YOU WRITTEN THESE WORDS TO TAKE THE REVENGE.
WHO WAS I AS THE LAWYER TO SAY THAT MY CLIENT IS NOT PRESSING THE CASE AGAINST LAND GRABBER, A MAFIA, A RANK TRESPASSER , WHO ADMITTEDLY WAS THE TRESPASSERS HAVING THE SUPPORT OF HER HETCH MAN TO KILL MY CLIENT ALL THE TIME.
JUSTICE
No comments:
Post a Comment